# systems · systems.sh

Cybersecurity Reports

Vulnerability assessments and security reports, written to a professional standard.

RankedRemediated

A security report that lists findings with no severity ranking or fix reads like a scan output, not an assessment — and that's usually the mark difference. We rank by impact, pair every finding with a remediation step, and write to a recognised report structure so it reads like something a real security team would file.

What you get

  • Assessment scoped to exactly what your brief authorises
  • Findings ranked by severity, not just listed
  • Remediation steps included for every finding, not just the flag
  • Written to a recognised report structure (e.g. OWASP-style)
  • Screenshots and evidence redacted of anything genuinely sensitive
  • A one-page executive summary for the non-technical section

What to send first

  • The lab sheet or brief, including the topology or architecture diagram
  • The tools required (Packet Tracer, GNS3, AWS, Azure, Docker, GitHub Actions…)
  • What evidence the marker wants — configs, screenshots, logs, a report
  • Access details only if the brief requires your own account (never your university login)

How it runs

  1. 01

    Send the spec

    The brief, the rubric, any starter code and the versions your marker uses. A photo of the PDF is fine to begin with.

  2. 02

    Scope and quote in writing

    We read it properly, ask what is unclear, and confirm a fixed price and delivery date. A small advance confirms the order.

  3. 03

    Build against the brief

    Work is tracked task by task against the spec. Longer projects are split into milestones you can review as they land.

  4. 04

    Tested handover

    A repo that installs from a README, run against your test cases, with the write-up if your rubric asks for one.

  5. 05

    Fixes and walkthrough

    One round of fixes if a marker flags something, and a walkthrough of how it works so you can explain it.

Cybersecurity Reports: common questions

Usually not — we build in our own environment and hand over the configuration, infrastructure code and evidence. If the brief insists on your account, we agree scoped access first. We never ask for your university login.

Yes. Evidence is captured as the work is done, labelled to match the brief's tasks, so the report and the submission line up.

It depends on the scope of the brief, the stack and the deadline. Send the spec on WhatsApp and you get a fixed price and delivery date in writing before any work starts — no hourly meter.

Turnaround depends on scope and is agreed with the quote. Tell us the real deadline, including the timezone, and we will say honestly whether it is workable before you commit.

./send-brief

Send your scope.

Paste the cybersecurity reports brief into WhatsApp — the message already names the service. Scope and price come back in writing.